There are few elections more political than the one to choose a new pope

There are few elections more political than the one to choose a new pope


Friends were discussing the brilliant new film Conclave this week, and said they were surprised at
how political electing a new pope is. I was surprised at their surprise.

One could argue, as I do, that any large-scale human interaction tends to involve politics โ€“ in the
sense of trying to influence, manoeuvre, persuade and manipulate. That applies to a suburban football club as much as it does the United Nations.

And while one might think religion should seek to avoid internal politics because of the subjectโ€™s
moral import, in fact it is especially intense there precisely because people think it is so important.
Just look at the New Testament: why are the religious leaders so angry with Jesus and seeking to kill
him? Because he is a threat to their authority โ€“ politics!

Our columnist Barney Zwartz twice covered papal conclaves in Rome โ€“ and reckons the film <i>Conclave</i> nails it.

Our columnist Barney Zwartz twice covered papal conclaves in Rome โ€“ and reckons the film Conclave nails it.

And no religious institution is more intensely political than the Catholic Church, both because of its
structure and its breadth. It doesnโ€™t always do it well, as victims of the Inquisition would attest.

Conclaves are all about politics, despite the insistence of the Church that the Holy Spirit oversees the result. When I was religion editor of this august masthead, I went to Rome to cover two conclaves: the 2005 one that elected Pope Benedict XVI and the 2013 one that elected the current pope, Francis.

It was utterly fascinating. The eternal cityโ€™s population swells by about a million curious or
passionate Catholics, hundreds of thousands of whom gather in St Peterโ€™s Square to see what colour
smoke will emerge from the Sistine Chapel.

Once a conclave begins the cardinal electors are supposed to be completely silent during
proceedings (and thereafter), but Italian journalists had a huge advantage because many of their
cardinals leaked like sieves. In contrast, Australia had only one elector, the late Cardinal George Pell,
who probably didnโ€™t speak to anyone but certainly not to The Age.

But he was known to have played a large role as a โ€œcampaign managerโ€ for the deeply conservative
Joseph Ratzinger (who won on the fourth ballot to become Benedict VXI) and was also a significant
figure in 2013.

Loading



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *