Markle or Sussex? The debate over Meghan’s last name

It’s understandable that Meghan would want people to use the name that she and Prince Harry have chosen as their family name and which appears on their passports, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. But as with most Meghan-related news, the clip quickly made waves online as people took to social media to criticise her. Some commenters thought she was being pretentious, and others called her out over a belief that she had seemingly confused her royal house with the family’s surname.

There was similar confusion over how to refer to the duchess after she and Prince Harry announced in 2020 that they would “step back” from their official royal duties and move to the United States.

Two days after the new series premiered, during an appearance on The View, Kaling said that she had “a great time” on the show, despite critics who felt like Meghan had behaved in a passive-aggressive way towards her.

The debate over Meghan’s name, however, continued.

“She’s either totally oblivious to what her actual name is, she doesn’t understand it, or she’s lying,” says Hilary Fordwich, a royal family expert.

Fordwich says that while it isn’t new for a member of the royal family to choose to go by their birth titles (Prince Harry went by Harry Wales during his time in the British army), that doesn’t usually make it their family name.

“By established protocol, he can use Harry Sussex, which I’ve never heard him use,” she said. “She could choose to use Meghan Sussex, but it’s not their surname. This was the issue in that Netflix clip.”

However, Rachel Bowie, royals editor for lifestyle website PureWow, didn’t think what Meghan said was problematic at all, adding that it was “totally within royal protocol”.

“Even though Archie and Lili were christened ‘Mountbatten-Windsor’, Harry and Meghan are borrowing Sussex from their title to make up their last name,” Bowie, who was previously the co-host of the Royally Obsessed podcast, says.

Opinions have continued to roll in, even from relatives of Harry and Meghan.

Lord Ivar Mountbatten, a cousin of King Charles III and a reality television star on The Traitors, claims Meghan had been wrong about her own surname in an interview he gave to Town & Country, saying the family’s surname should be Mountbatten-Windsor.

Loading

“Her children are called Archie and Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor; they’re not called Archie and Lilibet Sussex because Sussex is a title,” he said.

Thomas Markle, Meghan’s estranged father, complained to the Daily Mail on Saturday about her decision to no longer use the name Markle, even though it’s still fairly common for a woman to adopt her husband’s name after getting married.

Understanding the complexities of how to refer to the royal family requires a look at its evolving history regarding names. According to the official website for the British royal family: “Members of the royal family can be known both by the name of the royal house, and by a surname, which are not always the same.” It’s uncommon for core members of the royal family to be referred to by a surname at all.

Members of the royal family had no surname before 1917 and were referred to only by the name of the house or dynasty they belonged to. That year, King George V adopted Windsor as the name of the house and surname of his family.

In 1960, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Harry’s grandparents, altered the name to distinguish their direct descendants from the rest of the extended royal family, making their new surname Mountbatten-Windsor, which included Philip’s family name.

“For the most part, members of the royal family who are entitled to the style and dignity of HRH Prince or Princess do not need a surname, but if at any time any of them do need a surname (such as upon marriage), that surname is Mountbatten-Windsor,” the royal family’s site reads.

Meghan now lives outside that structure, meaning those rules do not apply to her. So her family’s choice to adopt Sussex as their legal surname will simply be added to the list of things she is either criticised or embraced for.